Who decides?
Every AI system has a person in charge. AI helps people make decisions, but those decisions are made and signed off by someone with a name.
We build custom software, and some of it uses artificial intelligence to optimise, predict or classify. Here we explain, without jargon, what AI governance is and the rules we follow to work safely, fairly and transparently.
An artificial intelligence system learns from data and helps make decisions or generates content: it recommends, classifies, writes, predicts. It is very useful, but it does not think like a person, it can be wrong and it is not always easy to know how it reached a conclusion.
Governing AI means deciding in advance how it is used, within what limits and with what safeguards. In practice, it comes down to answering three questions well.
Every AI system has a person in charge. AI helps people make decisions, but those decisions are made and signed off by someone with a name.
We know where the data comes from, whether we are allowed to use it and whether it fairly represents the people it affects.
We measure the results, listen to anyone who spots a fault and have a procedure to fix it or switch the system off if needed.
A useful comparison: cars are not dangerous just because they exist, but driving without a licence, traffic rules or inspections would be. AI governance is the driving licence, the highway code and the roadworthiness test of intelligent systems.
AI amplifies what it is given. If the data or the design has a problem, the system repeats it thousands of times and at high speed. These are the risks we watch most closely.
A model trained on unbalanced data can treat certain groups of people worse without anyone intending it.
Generative AI can make up data or references with complete confidence. It looks right, but it isn't.
Entering personal or client information into the wrong tool can expose it outside the company.
If nobody understands why a system reaches a result, nobody can explain, audit or correct it.
Since 2024, the European Union has had the world’s first comprehensive AI law, known as the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). It does not ban artificial intelligence: it regulates it according to the risk it poses to people.
The more a system can affect someone’s health, safety or rights, the more requirements it must meet. These are the risk levels and how we handle them.
Banned since February 2025
Uses considered a threat to people's rights.
What we do: We neither develop nor use this kind of system, and our policy says so explicitly.
Obligations apply from December 2027 (and August 2028 for regulated products)
Systems that can influence important decisions about people's lives. They must manage risks, use quality data, be documented and have human oversight.
What we do: If a client project might fall into this level, we analyse it with them before starting, to identify the requirements that apply and design the solution with them in mind from day one.
Transparency obligations since August 2026
Systems that people interact with or that generate content. The key is that users know they are dealing with AI.
What we do: When a solution we build interacts with people or generates content, we design it to clearly identify itself as AI.
No specific obligations
The vast majority of AI applications. Following voluntary codes of conduct is encouraged.
What we do: We still apply our usage policy and good practice in quality, documentation and security.
The law applies in stages. In 2026 the EU approved the Digital Omnibus package, which postpones the high-risk obligations but keeps the rest of the timeline.
In Spain, the supervisory authority is the Spanish Agency for the Supervision of Artificial Intelligence (AESIA). This information is for general guidance and is not legal advice.
This is what it means in the daily work of everyone on the team when they use generative AI tools, such as coding or writing assistants.
We don't build general-purpose models. When a client asks us for a model, we develop it specifically for them, combining their data with open data, and the result is for their use.
No. Your data is used only for your project and is handled as agreed with you and in line with the General Data Protection Regulation.
From public sources whose licences allow their use, such as the open data portals of public administrations and research bodies. We check their origin and quality before adding them to a model.
We will always tell you. At UPintelligence you always deal with a person, and the solutions we build that interact with users are designed to identify themselves as AI.
No. We use it to automate repetitive tasks and save time, but the design, the review and the responsibility for the work remain with our team.
Get in touch. A person from our team will review your case, explain how the result was produced and, if needed, correct it.
At least once a year, and whenever the regulations change or we adopt a new type of AI. The date of the last review is shown at the end of this page.
This policy was last reviewed in October 2026
Tell us about your context and we will tell you how we can help.